Here is a document that explains how the AIDS movement changed the medical research paradigm:
From page 3: "Change is possible. But in order to create change, the focused voices of advocates must be heard through the din. Individuals and organizations must do the hard work of becoming ready to question the status quo, and be smart enough to present well-founded alternatives. Strong leaders in government must pave the path and prepare to stay the course. Specific strategies with clear goals must be established in order to hold people accountable."
The difference as I see it is that with spinal cord injury many buy into the wholesale hope and hype. Many aren't educated in the science so they fall prey to some researchers making promises of cures or that people are already walking. That was not the case with Aids. They spoke up and monitored the research. Their desperation drove them and they weren't going to be bought.
paolo...firstly i just want to say this is a great post
Ive taken a quick read through the linked document (il digest again later lol) and it is indeed very interesting.
I think as individuals we are very passive about a cure for our own Spinal Cord Injury. The AIDS movement was intelligently thought out and collaborated and as bob says there was a driving force, a motivation..stemming from desperation.
I think to develop a movement similar is possible but would need very similar elements to the AIDS movement model. People with such drive are far and few between and the understanding and knowledge on the science of SCI research. But im sure there are many potential potential campaigners or current ones who could set this into motion. You are making a good start paolo, your posts are thought provoking.
6 years ago i became involved with a horse rescue organisation..the campaign was to try stop the live export of horses travelling from France to Italy for slaughter. I was involved, firstly, with a huge charitable organisation but then realised that the charity was being 'clever'.
The organisation uses the plight of these horses that die along the journey as their 'front' and use it to receive donations from horse lovers. 70 years, with the same campaign and no change, the export continues..the charity still uses this plight as their platform for receiving funds that they use elsewhere and only a small proportion goes for its intended purpose. They cleverly undercover videos that show the horrific state of these animals and deaths to gain donations.
So i tried to campaign myself after becoming dissolusioned, I saved and purchased one of the horses in France that was due to travel to Italy, brought him to the UK and contacted newspapers and charities. All i wanted was a petition signing and to be honest, many people, even people who owned horses could not be bother....it was impossible to do on my own.
Sorry to divert but your post reminded me of my experience.
Good question paolo and good answer bob. I don't have time to read the PDF at the moment but I'll get to it later so I can get a better understanding of things like Lαrα has mentioned
Wow Lara, I remember helping my son with a paper on horse slaughter. I learned a lot about life from that one even about president Obama. They presented the slaughter of horses as an act of mercy to the wild starving horses. There were votes on it and would you know the only two states the slaughter was approved was Texas and Illinois the reason being they were the only states that had slaughter houses, so at the time I guess Obama went along with the slaughterhouse's lobbyist for a while until the public uproar came along, then he changed his opinion.
Do people who want to protect horses fight with each other?
Too bad that's not the case with Sci Cure research goals
Grass roots advocacy fertilized by Big Pharma-DICHOTOMY at it's best
To be honest bob horse lovers argue over the issue on horse slaughter but i personally challenged the charity that 'claim' to be working towards stopping live export of horses. I dont have issue with horse slaughter if done humanely but i have issue with live export of horses when the travel conditions lead them to die from overheating, lack of water or injuries.
My issue with thecharity that took monies from people who believed they gave their money in good faith to stop this practice. They promote fundraising through shocking graphic videos that belong to an activist group, people donate because they are horrified to see what happens to these horses. The charity then isnt effective s stopping the live export because they dont use the monies for the intended purpose...hmmm it makes me think more and more about the bigger picture with SCI research.
To be honest bob horse lovers argue over the issue on horse slaughter but i personally challenged the charity that 'claim' to be working towards stopping live export of horses. I dont have issue with horse slaughter if done humanely but i have issue with live export of horses when the travel conditions lead them to die from overheating, lack of water or injuries.
My issue with thecharity that took monies from people who believed they gave their money in good faith to stop this practice. They promote fundraising through shocking graphic videos that belong to an activist group, people donate because they are horrified to see what happens to these horses. The charity then isnt effective s stopping the live export because they dont use the monies for the intended purpose...hmmm it makes me think more and more about the bigger picture with SCI research.
More or less the same thing has happened with many SCI orgs. The Rick Hansen foundation is an example, we questioned them for long time to uncover what was really going on. No money were really going to cure research. More orgs need to be investigated properly...
According to Brett C. Stockdill, the AIDS movement, particularly in the late 1980s and continuing through the early 1990s, is characterized as a movement “because it was composed of a diverse set of people whose needs were not being met by existing dominant institutions, such as the government, the medical establishment, and pharmaceutical corporations, and who used ‘politics by other means’ to further their collective interests” (2003: 20) ...... “At its most radical points, ACT UP worked to expose how the devastation caused by the AIDS epidemic has been fueled by systematic oppression. In doing so, the organization moved beyond more moderate movement organizations that have typically worked within the system rather than challenging it” (Stockdill 2003:156). Even though the movement died out for the most part by the mid 1990s, today activism against AIDS still exists and organizations like ACT UP still thrive, although to a much lesser degree then during the AIDS movement. History of Aids Movement
‘You slammed the door in our face—we’re gonna come kick it down.’ I like the attitude” (Stockdill 2003: 108). Basically, as Janet seems to explain, ACT UP did not take no as an answer. The organization was determined to see change and was not afraid to take direct action to be sure its goals were met.
According to Brett C. Stockdill, the AIDS movement, particularly in the late 1980s and continuing through the early 1990s, is characterized as a movement “because it was composed of a diverse set of people whose needs were not being met by existing dominant institutions, such as the government, the medical establishment, and pharmaceutical corporations, and who used ‘politics by other means’ to further their collective interests” (2003: 20) ...... “At its most radical points, ACT UP worked to expose how the devastation caused by the AIDS epidemic has been fueled by systematic oppression. In doing so, the organization moved beyond more moderate movement organizations that have typically worked within the system rather than challenging it” (Stockdill 2003:156). Even though the movement died out for the most part by the mid 1990s, today activism against AIDS still exists and organizations like ACT UP still thrive, although to a much lesser degree then during the AIDS movement. History of Aids Movement
‘You slammed the door in our face—we’re gonna come kick it down.’ I like the attitude” (Stockdill 2003: 108). Basically, as Janet seems to explain, ACT UP did not take no as an answer. The organization was determined to see change and was not afraid to take direct action to be sure its goals were met.
All the existing SCI orgs are moderate movement organizations that work within the system rather than challenging it.
I believe that if we can't get as radical as the AIDS people we won't have the impact needed to make a cure happen in a not too distant future. Small changes I have seen and contributed to make happen in the past are far from what is needed.
Wow Lara, I remember helping my son with a paper on horse slaughter. I learned a lot about life from that one even about president Obama. They presented the slaughter of horses as an act of mercy to the wild starving horses. There were votes on it and would you know the only two states the slaughter was approved was Texas and Illinois the reason being they were the only states that had slaughter houses, so at the time I guess Obama went along with the slaughterhouse's lobbyist for a while until the public uproar came along, then he changed his opinion.
Do people who want to protect horses fight with each other?
Too bad that's not the case with Sci Cure research goals
Hey bob, we have the same problem here when it comes to feral camel slaughter (culling), I really think the world could do without do gooders.
So far I like what I see here. This forum owes no allegiance, It's well run and well moderated allowing for difficult conversations as long as they remain civil.
So far I like what I see here. This forum owes no allegiance, It's well run and well moderated allowing for difficult conversations as long as they remain civil.
bob...thankyou for saying I like to think, as staff, that we are very fair and unbiased. We support and encourage any discussion and topics to be explored here, however sensitive, diverse or emotive they may be..so long as all members are respectful towards each other mutually.
So far I like what I see here. This forum owes no allegiance, It's well run and well moderated allowing for difficult conversations as long as they remain civil.
Thanks for the comment bob, we encourage discussions as long as they're civil
So far I like what I see here. This forum owes no allegiance, It's well run and well moderated allowing for difficult conversations as long as they remain civil.
Thanks for the comment bob, we encourage discussions as long as they're civil
Discussions that lead us into positive action would be even better
Grass roots advocacy fertilized by Big Pharma-DICHOTOMY at it's best